I’ve ranted before about the whole pink-for-girls and drab-for-boys
thing. Just try to buy a toy or an article of clothing for anyone under the age
of 15, and you’ll see what I mean. I suspect today’s approach to
gender-specific colors would confuse our grandparents. White was the preferred
color for babies and children of any sex until they were at least old enough to
go to school; primarily because white clothes and diapers could be bleached. Older
children were dressed in paler shades of the colors adults wore. Red was
considered a strong, virile, masculine color, while blue was thought of as dainty,
delicate, and feminine. That means boys were more likely to be dressed in pink,
while girls more often wore pale blue. It wasn’t until the early 20th century –
and quite possibly as late as the 1940s – that we began to think of blue as
being for boys and pink for girls.
No comments:
Post a Comment